Principles

From OMXUS
Revision as of 14:58, 31 January 2026 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Import OMXUS content)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:OMXUS Infobox

The OMXUS Principles are the non-negotiable foundation of the system. These principles cannot be amended—if they are removed, the system is no longer OMXUS.

The Six Principles

1. Cannot Affect Individual Freedom

Collective decisions govern collective resources. No vote can constrain what you do with your own body, time, relationships, or property.

What votes CAN do:

  • Decide where to build a park
  • Set community resource allocation
  • Establish shared infrastructure priorities

What votes CANNOT do:

  • Restrict what you consume
  • Mandate beliefs or associations
  • Punish individual choices
  • Surveil without consent

2. Telemetry For Humans

Your data works FOR you.

What We Collect Why Who Benefits
Mood patterns AI insights on your wellbeing You
Activity data Prove your contributions You
Location proximity Help arrives in 60 seconds Everyone nearby
Voting history Verify your voice counted You + transparency

This is not surveillance OF you. This is intelligence ABOUT you, owned BY you, serving YOU.

The difference:

  • Surveillance: Hidden collection, asymmetric power, used against you
  • Telemetry for humans: Transparent, owned by you, serves your interests

3. Transparent Accountability

Everyone sees the same thing.

What's public:

  • Vouching chains
  • Responsibility propagation (1/3ⁿ)
  • Vote signatures and tallies
  • Proximity obligations
  • Contract completions

No hidden watchers. No asymmetric knowledge. We all see. We all know. We all benefit.

4. Non-Maleficence

The system cannot be weaponized against its users. Not "we promise not to"—architecturally impossible.

Attack Vector Why It Can't Happen
Steal identity NFC ring required, can't duplicate
Fake votes Signed by ring, verified on-chain
Target individuals No mechanism for individual punishment
Centralized shutdown Mesh network, no single point of control
Data exploitation User-owned, encrypted, no central access

No mechanism exists to harm participants.

5. Justice = Prevention Only

Full stop. This is not negotiable if the system is to be functional.

Old Justice OMXUS Justice
Harm happens → Punish Harm prevented → Never happens
After the fact Before the fact
Retribution Prevention
Isolation Connection
Recidivism Structural impossibility

How prevention works:

  1. Universal witness — You're never isolated. Someone is always nearby. Crimes of opportunity vanish.
  2. Instant response — Help arrives in 60 seconds. Harm is interrupted before it escalates.
  3. Cryptographic accountability — Actions are signed. Attribution is certain. Anonymity for harm is impossible.
  4. Proximity responsibility — Nearby people MUST help. Bystander effect eliminated by design.
  5. Economic alternative — Everyone can earn legitimately. Desperation-driven harm reduced.

Punishment is abolished. Retribution is meaningless. Only prevention matters.

6. Zero Effort, Enjoyable, Instant Rewards

People are the problem. People are also easy.

Principle Implementation
Zero friction One-tap actions, ring-based auth
Enjoyable Beautiful UI, satisfying feedback
Instant rewards Money, reputation, impact visible immediately

Every interaction must provide immediate value.

Test for every feature: "What does the user get RIGHT NOW?"

If you can't answer that, the feature fails.

Hierarchy

When principles conflict, this is the order:

  1. Cannot affect individual freedom (absolute)
  2. Non-maleficence (absolute)
  3. Justice = prevention only (absolute)
  4. Transparent accountability (enables the above)
  5. Telemetry for humans (serves the above)
  6. Zero effort, enjoyable, instant rewards (makes adoption possible)

The first three are hard constraints. The last three are implementation requirements.

Amendments

These principles can only be amended by:

  1. 75% national vote
  2. Followed by 6-month discussion period
  3. Followed by second 75% confirmation vote
  4. With explicit acknowledgment that the amendment does not violate principles 1-3

Principles 1, 2, and 3 cannot be amended. They are definitional. If they are removed, the system is no longer OMXUS.

See Also